About
- Home
- /
- About
From a Call Centre to the Rooms That Decide
Hi, I’m Shaikh Noman. Nineteen years in commercial roles, the last nine in enterprise sales. I still work in those rooms. Rooms where a single decision moves millions, and where what is said about you after you leave determines whether you are ever invited back.
What is NOM
NOM stands for No Ordinary Mentor, No Ordinary Method, a statement of register, not a slogan. It’s a 1:1 practice for mid-career professionals who are competent but overlooked, and the caseload is deliberately small, because the work is a senior read, not a curriculum.
The work is not motivational and it is not a script. You will hear the read as it is, including the parts that are uncomfortable. What is comfortable to hear and what is useful to hear are usually different sentences. Everything we build together, from a CV to a promotion case, is built to the standard I would defend in front of a room of decision makers. And nothing is taught here that has not first been tested in a real situation with real stakes. I still work in these rooms. My methods get tested every week, in rooms that do not grade on effort.
Where This Comes From
I didn’t start in the rooms where careers are decided. I started in a call centre. Nobody handed me a map between those two points. No sponsor. No structured mentorship. No one explaining how the invisible rooms worked. I learned it the slow way, deal by deal, mistake by mistake, watching which
people rose and which people didn’t, and working out that the two groups were rarely who I expected. Every framework in this practice was tested in real
situations with real stakes before it was ever used in a session.
That is the asymmetry NOM exists to correct. The lessons took me the better part of two decades to assemble. You should not need two decades to learn them.
The Background that built NOM
The Kitchen Table
Last year, my daughter ran for head girl. She was the strongest candidate on the shortlist, and the one carrying the most nerves about it. Public speaking unsettled her. Making a case for herself in front of the whole school unsettled her more.
The week before, we sat at the kitchen table and worked through it the way I work through enterprise deals. Who actually decides this. What they’re already half-thinking. What the second sentence about her needs to be when teachers talk in the staff room. Where the gaps were in how she was being read, and what to do about them.
She went through the speech, the questions, the process. She won.
I noticed the same pattern twice more, with two professionals I’d been mentoring informally. One was between roles and not landing the next one. The other was trying to move into a different kind of career altogether. Both were competent. Both were stuck in the gap between the work they were producing and the way they were being read by the people deciding. Both got there, once we worked on what those people were actually reading.
The Pattern
Once you see it, you can’t unsee it. Careers are not decided in the rooms the candidate is in. They’re decided in the rooms they’re not in. In the half-sentence a senior leader uses about you in a calibration meeting. In the line a hiring manager stops at on your CV, and the second sentence the panel uses after you’ve left. In whose name surfaces when someone asks, who could run this?
Most competent people work hard inside the visible room and have no read on the invisible one. They mistake being reliable for being legible. The two are not the same thing, and only one of them gets you promoted, hired, or moved into the next chapter.